Is New York Times Worth It

What Broke The Newyork Times

The New York Times entered the digital era under duress. In 2011, the Times erected a paywall in what it called a subscription-first business model. The gamble was that readers would want to pay for quality journalism. It was a risk, and at first it didnt seem to be paying off: after a challenging 2014, the company shed 100 people from the newsroom in buyouts and layoffs.

A.G. Sulzberger, who was getting ready to replace his father as publisher, commissioned an in-house report, its title Innovation. The report made it very clear who was to blame. A journalists job, the report said, no longer ended with choosing, reporting and publishing the news. To compensate for the steady decline in advertising revenue due to digitisation, the wall dividing the newsroom and business side had to come down. The hard work of growing our audience falls squarely on the newsroom, the report said, so the Timesshould be encouraging reporters and editors to promote their stories.

Of course, journalists have always been aware who their readers are and have catered to them, consciously and unconsciously. But it was something else entirely to suggest that journalists should be collaborating with their audience to produce user-generated content, as the report put it. Innovation presaged a new direction for the paper of record: become digital-first or perish.

And then came the Tom Cotton op-ed.

Well, they do.

How To Create Your Own Vpn

Some people still benefit from using a VPN, and not all providers are bad.

Wirecutter, a New York Times publication that tests products, recommends a few that are still trustworthy. But if your next VPN gets bought by a larger company, you may have to vet its trustworthiness all over again. Im tired of the whiplash, so I created my own private network service.

I turned to Algo VPN, a free tool developed by Mr. Guido that automatically builds a VPN service in the cloud, which shields my browsing activity by allowing me to create a virtual tunnel on an outside server for my internet traffic to pass through.

Following the instructions listed on the Algo VPN project website, I set up a cloud service where my VPN service would be located on Amazons web services, a reputable and widely trusted cloud provider. The rest of the steps involved installing some scripts on my computer and typing in commands to generate my VPN.

After about an hour, I set up a VPN that worked flawlessly. The best part? Not only is it free to use, but I no longer have to worry about trust, because the operator of the technology is me.

Use Google To Read 5 Articles For Free Daily

This method still limits you somewhat, but youll get a lot more free content than you would if you simply went directly to the New York Times website.

If youve stumbled on any other ways to bypass the New York Times limits on free access, please share in the comments.

Technology has taken a vantage leap in providing solutions for man. Before now, technology used to appear complex and would require a great deal of expertise to handle solutions available. Today, we have technology applicable in the simplest human activities as smart products with intelligent algorithms powering them as they make error-free judgments and provide intelligent and analytic solutions.

You May Like: Where Is The Wax Museum In New York

New York Times V Sullivan

The paper’s involvement in a 1964 libel case helped bring one of the key United States Supreme Court decisions supporting freedom of the press, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. In it, the United States Supreme Court established the “actual malice” standard for press reports about public officials or public figures to be considered defamatory or libelous. The malice standard requires the plaintiff in a defamation or libel case to prove the publisher of the statement knew the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity. Because of the high burden of proof on the plaintiff, and difficulty proving malicious intent, such cases by public figures rarely succeed.

We Dont Fit Your Gender Binary Deal With It

Sloan Leo, they/he, New York City, 2021.Credit…Photographs by Lola Flash for The New York Times

Supported by

Lola Flash is a photographer whose work focuses on L.G.B.T.Q. and feminist issues.

A few years ago, I went to see a performance at a jazz bar in Greenwich Village. I remember feeling happy, buoyed by the sounds of the instruments blending. But then I got up to go to the bathroom, and there a woman chastised me for using the ladies room. I never expected something like this to happen in New York City.

When youre a butch dyke like me, people often assume youre a man. When you present outside the norm, it can sometimes make you feel youre unworthy somehow. Too often it feels as though society doesnt see our humanity. The way people sometimes speak to us can be so dehumanizing.

Anna, they/them, New York City, 2021Xunami, he/she/they, New York City, 2021

This photography project was born out of my frustration with being misgendered. I set out to photograph people whose look doesnt fit a gender stereotype. I wanted to show my subjects in the light of joy and beauty, with images that say: This is who we are and what we look like can you give us some space?

Felli, they/them, New York City, 2021.Rio, she/her, Brooklyn, 2021.Jay, she/her, New York City, 2021.

I usually work in my small living room. But for this series, I worked in a studio to create a space to collaborate with my subjects. I had a desk for us to sit at and look at the pictures together.

Also Check: How Much Are Tolls From Virginia To New York

Creating Technological Solutions Transparently

This article suggests that the process of creating technological solutions be made transparent and subject to contribution from many people who would end up as users of the product male, female, young, old, learned, unlearned and all other preferences as we have them. It also underscores the importance of having women on product development teams. This approach is not sure to eliminate all forms of bias, but it is a good way to start in order to appraise the full benefits of technology.

New Leadership In The Postwar Period

Under Sulzberger the Times improved steadily in news coverage, financial strength, and technical progress. In a diversification move in 1944 the NYTC purchased New York City radio stations WQXR and WQXR-FM. Sulzberger opposed without success the unionization of Times employees. The companys first published financial statement in 1958 showed 60 consecutive years of increasing profits. In 1957 a recapitalization split the common stock into A and B common stock, with the B shares, mostly held by the Ochs trust, having voting control over the company. Sulzbergers health began to fail in the late 1950s. He retired in 1961. His successor as president and publisher was his son-in-law, Orvil E. Dryfoos. Dryfoos died in 1963. On June 20, 1963, he was succeeded in turn as president and publisher by Arthur HaysSulzbergers son, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, who continued in 1991 to lead the NYTC as chairman and chief executive officer.

Don’t Miss: How Much Are Tolls From Virginia To New York

Get A Compelling Long Read And Must

Yesterday the New York Times announced that it will cut back the number of articles it allows nonsubscribers to read free, from 20 a month to 10. After 10 reads, the site will prompt the reader to sign up for a subscription.

I know what youre thinking. There will be ways to sneak around, under and over the NYT wall.

Right you are, Sherlock.

Follow a link from Facebook or Twitter and youll get to a story even if youre over the limit. You can make your way to stories through Google Search too.

But snatching over-the-limit freebies are going to grow increasingly challengingand, really, is it worth the time youre putting in to beat the system?

There are different subscription plans, but why mess around? For $35 a month, you get unlimited digital access and all kinds of apps. Dont think thats a deal? Look at your cable bill lately?

The NYT cant replace keeping up with local news coverage. But there are reasons aplenty why the NYT should become a daily read.

Below, a subjective 10:

1. International coverage. Metro newspapers scrapped foreign bureaus years ago, making the NYTs coverage critical. A moment ago I checked the home page and found breaking news from Toulouse, France of the standoff with the alleged Al Qaeda terrorist suspected of killing three children and a rabbi at a Jewish school. On the same page there was analysis of the Syria situation. The takeaway: Assad could hold onto power for months, even years.

In Between Chants Union Leaders Outlined The Ways The New York Times Has Allegedly Delayed Negotiations

Workers at the three New York Times unions the Times Guild, Times Tech Guild, and Wirecutter Union rallied outside the Times building Tuesday in protest of what they say are anti-union tactics by company management.

All three units, which are part of the NewsGuild of New York, have ongoing labor disputes with The New York Times Company. The Times Guild, which represents more than 1,300 employees, is renegotiating its contract after its previous one expired in March, and the Wirecutter Union is calling on the company to accelerate first contract negotiations after nearly two years at the bargaining table. The Times Tech Guild, which represents more than 650 tech workers, is still waiting for its National Labor Relations Board election, which will determine if the union is officially certified.

In between chants of Hey Gray Lady, time to pay me and Whats appalling? Bosses stalling, union leaders outlined the ways The New York Times has allegedly delayed negotiations. The NewsGuild of New York has filed at least five unfair labor practice charges against the company since August.

Every single person here who makes the Times what it is deserves representation, said NewsGuild of New York president Susan DeCarava. They deserve fair wages. They deserve a newsroom and workplace that is safe and healthy and strong and runs according to the values that we all represent.

You May Like: Rolling Loud New York Line Up

The New York Times Company Q2 2021 Earnings Call Transcript

On the call today, we have Meredith Kopit Levien, President and Chief Executive Officer and Roland Caputo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. That milestone follows the second quarter with strong revenue and profit growth, modest net subscription additions and progress on our — advancing our underlying model.

If You Invested $1000 In New York Times Co A Decade Ago This Is How Much It’d Be Worth Now

How much a stock’s price changes over time is a significant driver for most investors. Not only can price performance impact your portfolio, but it can help you compare investment results across sectors and industries as well.

Another factor that can influence investors is FOMO, or the fear of missing out, especially with tech giants and popular consumer-facing stocks.

What if you’d invested in New York Times Co. ten years ago? It may not have been easy to hold on to NYT for all that time, but if you did, how much would your investment be worth today?

New York Times Co.’s Business In-Depth

With that in mind, let’s take a look at New York Times Co.’s main business drivers.

Bottom Line

Anyone can invest, but building a successful investment portfolio takes a combination of a few things: research, patience, and a little bit of risk. So, if you had invested in New York Times Co. a decade ago, you’re probably feeling pretty good about your investment today.

A $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $6,941.18, or a gain of 594.12%, as of August 30, 2021, according to our calculations. This return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.

The S& P 500 rose 283.19% and the price of gold increased -2.13% over the same time frame in comparison.

Analysts are forecasting more upside for NYT too.

Don’t Miss: How Much Are Tolls From Virginia To New York

Its Time To Stop Paying For A Vpn

Many virtual private network services that were meant to protect your web browsing can no longer be trusted. Here are other ways.

• Read in app

By Brian X. Chen

Im done with paying for a virtual private network, a service that claims to protect your privacy when youre connected to a public Wi-Fi network at the local coffee shop, the airport or a hotel.

For more than a decade, security experts have recommended using a VPN to shield your internet traffic from bad actors who are trying to snoop on you. But just as tech gadgets become outdated over time, so does some tech advice.

The reality is that web security has improved so much in the last few years that VPN services, which charge monthly subscription fees that cost as much as Netflix, offer superfluous protection for most people concerned about privacy, some security researchers said.

Many of the most popular VPN services are now also less trustworthy than in the past because they have been bought by larger companies with shady track records. Thats a deal-breaker when it comes to using a VPN service, which intercepts our internet traffic. If you cant trust a product that claims to protect your privacy, what good is it?

Trusting these people is really critical, Matthew Green, a computer scientist who studies encryption, said about VPN providers. Theres no good way to know what theyre doing with your data, which they have huge amounts of control over.

Let Us Help You Protect Your Digital Life

Found 527 Of Over 632 Reviews

Cons

Don’t Miss: Where Is The Wax Museum In New York

Personal Sacrifices Are Worth It Says Nobel Peace Prize Winner

I am honored that the Norwegian Nobel Committee has honored me and my fellow journalist Dmitri Muratov in this way. This relentless campaign of harassment and intimidation against me and my fellow journalists in the Philippines is a stark example of a global trend that journalists and freedom of the press facing increasingly adverse conditions. The Philippine government filed 10 arrest warrants against me in the last year. The government has prevented my travel four times, including to when my mother was diagnosed with cancer, and I needed to go to see my aging parents. I think this just shows you that the battle is worth it. The personal sacrifices are worth it.

Arrival Of Adolph Ochs At The End Of The 19th Century

Ochs’s first two years with the Times were a continual struggle to carry on operations and improve the paper with inadequate capital. The expenses of covering the Spanish-American War in 1898 came close to ruining the paper, which sold then for three cents a copy. Some Times executives advised raising the price, but Ochs made the brilliant and daring decision to reduce the price to one cent. Within a year paid circulation trebled from 26,000 to 76,000. Advertising linage increased by nearly 40 percent, and the paper was profitable. Despite subsequent price increases, this was the beginning of a long upward trend in circulation and profitability. On August 14, 1900, Ochs received the NYTC stock certificates that established his control over the paper and the company, a controlling interest that was still held by his descendants in 1991.

Under Ochs, the NYTC followed a general policy of avoiding diversification, although Ochs himself continued as the personal owner and publisher of the Chattanooga Times and had a private investment in a Philadelphia paper between 1901 and 1913. In 1926, however, the NYTC did take part ownership, along with Kimberly & Clark Company, in a Canadian paper mill, the Spruce Falls Power and Paper Company, to assure its supplies of newsprint.

You May Like: Where Is The Wax Museum In New York

Walter Duranty’s Holodomor Coverage And Pulitzer

Walter Duranty, who served as its Moscow bureau chief from 1922 through 1936, has been criticized for a series of stories in 1931 on the Soviet Union and won a Pulitzer Prize for his work at that time however, he has been criticized for his denial of widespread famine, most particularly Holodomor, a famine in Soviet Ukraine in the 1930s in which he summarized Russian propaganda, and the Times published, as fact: “Conditions are bad, but there is no famine”.

In 2003, after the Pulitzer Board began a renewed inquiry, the Times hired , professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review Duranty’s work. Von Hagen found Duranty’s reports to be unbalanced and uncritical, and that they far too often gave voice to Stalinistpropaganda. In comments to the press he stated, “For the sake of The New York Times’ honor, they should take the prize away.”The Ukrainian Weekly covered the efforts to rescind Duranty’s prize. The Times has since made a public statement and the Pulitzer committee has declined to rescind the award twice stating, “…Mr. Duranty’s 1931 work, measured by today’s standards for foreign reporting, falls seriously short. In that regard, the Board’s view is similar to that of The New York Times itself…”.