Tuesday, September 27, 2022

Is It The New York Times Or New York Times

New York Times V Sullivan

The New York Times: Kamala Harris “Worried That Biden Staff Looked Down On Her,” “Fixated” On Snubs

The paper’s involvement in a 1964 libel case helped bring one of the key United States Supreme Court decisions supporting freedom of the press, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. In it, the United States Supreme Court established the “actual malice” standard for press reports about public officials or public figures to be considered defamatory or libelous. The malice standard requires the plaintiff in a defamation or libel case to prove the publisher of the statement knew the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity. Because of the high burden of proof on the plaintiff, and difficulty proving malicious intent, such cases by public figures rarely succeed.

What Is A Trigger Law And Which States Have Them

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, it would not outlaw abortion. Instead, states would be able to individually determine the procedures legality.

Thirteen states across the country have signaled their readiness to ban abortion by passing so-called trigger laws, which would effectively ban abortions almost immediately after a decision from the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Some states that are very strongly anti-abortion, having been frustrated that they couldnt ban abortion because of Roe v. Wade, decided to pass laws that would be on the books and operative immediately in the future event that the court ever removed the protections of Roe, Donna Crane, an adjunct professor at San José State University with an expertise in womens rights and reproductive rights, said.

These are the 13 states that have passed trigger laws and what those laws entail:

Missiles Hit Power Stations In Lviv And Along Crucial Railways In Central And Western Ukraine

LVIV, Ukraine Russian missiles struck power plants in Lviv on Tuesday night, knocking out electricity in much of the western Ukrainian city near the Polish border where tens of thousands of civilians fleeing fighting in the east have sought refuge.

The attacks were the most widespread strikes inside the city since the war began, and came as the Russian military pressed its attacks on Ukraines railway system, the countrys lifeline to Poland, carrying both humanitarian aid and supplies for the military.

Altogether, Russian forces hit six electrical substations along the railway system in central and western Ukraine, said Oleksandr Kamyshin, the head of the Ukrainian Railway.

The mayor of Lviv, Andriy Sadovyi, said two power stations had been hit in the city, adding that there was serious damage to the municipal infrastructure. The head of the Lviv regional administration, Maksym Kozytskyy, later said that three power stations had been hit. Two people were reported injured.

A missile last month hit a garage near railway tracks on the outskirts of Lviv, killing at least seven people.

In addition to cutting off electricity, Tuesdays attacks also halted water pumping in some areas of Lviv.

The explosions were heard in the center of Lviv on Tuesday evening. Near the railway tracks on the outskirts of town, black smoke billowed in the distance while ambulances and fire trucks sped from the site.

I havent felt an explosion this close before, he said.

Recommended Reading: Nyc Birth Records

Abortion Rights Supporters Are Protesting In Cities Nationwide

Protesters across the country expressed their fury on Tuesday night about the leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that strongly suggests Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned. Crowds marched and chanted in support of abortion rights in San Francisco and New York, in Chicago and Atlanta, in Houston and Salt Lake City. In Los Angeles, videos shared on social media showed some confrontations between police officers and demonstrators.

Smaller protests took place in cities like Louisville, Ky., where a few dozen people held signs in front of the courthouse square. Jane Jones, 38, a public-school teacher, said she had become disillusioned with the Supreme Court and was angry about the apparent ruling. Bodily autonomy is important to the sanctity of our democratic process, she said.

But in downtown Seattle, thousands of people called for an escalating series of mass action, including possible national strikes if the constitutional right to abortion is abolished.

As protesters held signs such as Forced Motherhood Is Female Enslavement and chanted that it is time for people to rise up, speakers said that people needed to risk arrest through civil disobedience to ensure that a new generation of women did not end up with fewer rights than their mothers.

We are facing the single biggest attack on women and reproductive rights in most of our lifetimes, Councilwoman Kshama Sawant said.

She planned to travel to Washington, D.C., once the court ruling was finalized.

Accusations Of Liberal Bias

New York Times puts gun

In mid-2004, the newspaper’s then-public editor Daniel Okrent, wrote an opinion piece in which he said that The New York Times did have a liberal bias in news coverage of certain social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. He stated that this bias reflected the paper’s cosmopolitanism, which arose naturally from its roots as a hometown paper of New York City, writing that the coverage of the Times‘s Arts & Leisure Culture and the Sunday Times Magazine trend to the left.

If you’re examining the paper’s coverage of these subjects from a perspective that is neither urban nor Northeastern nor culturally seen-it-all if you are among the groups The Times treats as strange objects to be examined on a laboratory slide if your value system wouldn’t wear well on a composite New York Times journalist, then a walk through this paper can make you feel you’re traveling in a strange and forbidding world.

Times public editor Arthur Brisbane wrote in 2012:

When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so. Across the paper’s many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism for lack of a better term that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times.

Also Check: How To Pay A Traffic Ticket Online In Ny

Republicans Decry Leak But Refrain From Publicly Cheering Roes Demise

Opposition to abortion has been a key piece of the Republican Partys agenda for 40 years, a through-line binding Evangelical Christians and conservative Catholics to the party of small government and low taxes from Ronald Reagan to Donald J. Trump.

But with the Supreme Court seemingly on the verge of ending the constitutional right to abortion, the political party most identified with opposing Roe v. Wade was remarkably subdued in its celebration, more focused on how the news of the Supreme Courts draft decision had surfaced than on the impending decision itself.

Yesterdays unprecedented leak is an attempt to severely damage the Supreme Court, House Republican leaders wrote in a joint statement, asserting without evidence that the draft decision overturning Roe v. Wade obtained by Politico was part of a clearly coordinated campaign to intimidate and obstruct the justices of the United States Supreme Court.

Almost as an afterthought, the statement concluded that the leaders were praying for a decision that protects our most basic and precious right, the right to life.

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader who is normally quick to claim credit for the critical role he played in installing the conservative majority at the Supreme Court, was making no victory laps on Tuesday during his speech on the Senate floor.

We can now take the miracle we made in Missouri, and turn it into an American miracle, he said.

Emily Cochrane

This Crispy Fish Is Irresistible

Kay Chuns fish Milanese is topped with a lemony caper sauce, and makes for excellent sandwiches the next day.

  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

    Give this article

By Emily Weinstein

There are some types of dishes you find the world over. They have different names on their passports and come in diverging styles, but they share delicious fundamentals. The breaded cutlet known aliases include katsu, schnitzel and Milanesa is one of them, and a favorite of mine. So I was in heaven when I had chicken Milanese last week at a restaurant, the first one Ive had in a while, the cutlet golden and crisp, a wild heap of arugula salad on top and a jaunty lemon wedge on the side. Its a full meal, and a perfect one at that.

You really can Milanese just about anything. The traditional northern Italian dish is made with veal. Kay Chuns version below uses flounder and adds avocado on the side, for something lighter but no less delicious. Chicken, pork, tofu, cauliflower: All can be sliced or pounded, breaded and fried, served with something acidic for perk.

Which is your favorite, and what else are you cooking? Let me know what youre up to. Im , and I love to hear from you.

Recommended Reading: Nyc Wax Museum

Licensing Or Purchasing New York Times Content

You can purchase photographs and high quality page reproductions of The New York Times newspaper for personal use through the New York Times Store.

Copying or storing any article or photo for other than personal, non-commercial use requires permission from The New York Times. To learn more about content permissions view Obtaining and using Times content.

Can’t find what you’re looking for?

Review our Help topics or chat with one of our Customer Care advocates.

The Eu Unveils A Plan To Ban Russian Oil Imports

Teens Are In Crisis. Hereâs Why. | The New York Times

European Union countries should ban Russian oil imports in the next six months, and all refined oil products by the end of the year, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, told the European Parliament on Wednesday morning as she unveiled the blocs new package of measures against Russia.

The crude ban and other measures will be presented in detail to E.U. ambassadors Wednesday and are expected to be adopted by the end of the week.

Let us be clear, it will not be easy, Ms. von der Leyen told European deputies at the parliaments plenary session in Strasbourg, France. Some member states are strongly dependent on Russian oil. But we simply have to work on it.

Her announcement was greeted with applause by the members of Parliament, reflecting the broad consensus that the measure, while difficult to take and potentially economically painful for Europeans, has been long anticipated as necessary to start depriving President Vladimir V. Putin of cash needed to fund the war.

E.U. diplomats who have seen the sanctions documents said that Hungary and Slovakia, two members with outsize dependence on Russian oil imports, would be given until December 2023 to ban the fuel.

The diplomats also said the proposal will include sanctions against the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, in a highly symbolic move that will target him for supporting Mr. Putins invasions of Ukraine.

Matina Stevis-Gridneff

Matina Stevis-Gridneff

Read Also: How Much Are Tolls Between Dc And Nyc

Democrats Vow A Response To Roes Demise But Have Few Options

WASHINGTON With much of the Democratic Party raging over the seemingly imminent end to the almost 50-year-old constitutional right to an abortion, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York vowed on Tuesday to bring legislation to a vote that would codify a womans right to end her pregnancy.

But Mr. Schumer, the majority leader, and fellow Democrats in Washington appeared to find themselves powerless to stop the overturning of Roe v. Wade, as the battle for abortion rights shifted from Washington to the states.

The House voted 218 to 211 in September to codify the right to an abortion at the federal level after a Texas law made almost all abortions illegal and deputized individual citizens to enforce the prohibition. But in an evenly divided Senate, Democrats have neither the 60 votes necessary to bring up the House bill for consideration nor the 50 votes they would need to change the filibuster rules and allow it to pass with a simple majority.

Even if they did, Democrats are likely short of a simple majority in favor of abortion-rights legislation. Senator Joe Manchin III, the conservative-leaning Democrat from West Virginia, joined Republicans in February to block consideration of the House-passed bill when Mr. Schumer tried to bring it up the first time.

But neither Republican has been willing to break with her leaders and join Democrats in a bid to put an end to the filibuster, leaving Democrats with no path to bringing up a bill to enshrine Roe into federal law.

For Conservative Legal Movement A Long

WASHINGTON In May 1987, Attorney General Edwin Meese III traveled to St. Louis and spoke before a group of clergy members opposed to abortion. Denouncing Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Courts 1973 ruling on abortion rights, he told them that he saw reason to hope that in our lifetimes it would be thrown on the ash heap of legal history.

Thirty-five years later, a leaked draft opinion suggests that the Supreme Courts conservative majority is poised to overturn Roe, permitting states to outlaw abortion. Liberals may be aghast, but for the conservative legal movement, of which Mr. Meese was a key early figure, a long-sought moment of triumph appears to be at hand.

This will feel like a tremendous vindication for the conservative legal movement, said , a Harvard Law School visiting professor and the author of several books about the anti-abortion movement and legal politics. The movement goes beyond Roe v. Wade, but overruling it has become the preoccupation for the movement and the test of its success.

If the Supreme Court does issue a final opinion that looks much like the leaked draft, one question the moment will raise is what the conservative bloc does next with its control over the judiciary. Already, for example, the court has decided to hear a case in its next term that will give it an opportunity to curtail race-based affirmative action in college admissions.

Emily Cochrane contributed reporting.

Also Check: How Much Does It Cost To Register A Car In New York

Oklahoma Bans Abortions After About Six Weeks Of Pregnancy

Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma on Tuesday signed a bill prohibiting abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, the latest attempt by Republican lawmakers in the state to find legal avenues to ban abortions that will withstand judicial challenges.

The law, the Oklahoma Heartbeat Act, was modeled on the one that came into force in Texas last year, with both banning abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, and requiring enforcement from civilians rather than government officials.

It was signed one day after a leaked draft opinion from the Supreme Court suggests that Roe v. Wade will be overturned in the coming weeks.

I want Oklahoma to be the most pro-life state in the country because I represent all four million Oklahomans who overwhelmingly want to protect the unborn, Mr. Stitt .

The law, which was approved by Oklahomas Legislature last week, goes into effect immediately. It is distinct from a new law last month that outlaws abortion entirely except to save the life of a pregnant woman, which takes effect in late August.

Lawmakers in Oklahoma have put forward a number of anti-abortion bills in the hopes of closing off any potential loopholes.

Mr. Stitt has said he would sign any anti-abortion legislation that came to his desk.

When the law restricting abortions in Texas came into effect last year, Oklahoma became one of a number of states where Texas women came to terminate pregnancies. The new Oklahoma law would seem to close off that option.

Europe Is About To Ban Russian Oil Then What

What are the most iconic front pages of the New York Times ...

Russias decades-long dominance of Europes energy market is crumbling, and the biggest blow is expected this week as the European Union moves toward a ban on Russian oil.

Analysts say it will be possible to sever Europes oil ties to Russia, but the effort will take time and may lead to shortages and higher prices for gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other products a situation that could penalize consumers already struggling with inflation and, ultimately, derail the economic recovery from the pandemic.

Its going to be complicated, said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects, a research firm. You have got a de-linking of two very intertwined parts of the global energy system, he said, adding, There are going to be disruptions and costs associated with that.

But policymakers are increasingly convinced it is necessary and better to do that relatively rapidly, both to try and reduce revenues for funding Russia and to reduce European exposure to Russian influence, Mr. Bronze said.

The European Unions aims are clear. With Russia continuing to wage war in Ukraine, Europe wants to deny President Vladimir V. Putin funds from sales of oil, usually his largest export earner and a cornerstone of the Russian economy. Russias oil sales to Europe are worth $310 million a day, estimates Florian Thaler, chief executive of OilX, an energy research firm.

Those companies would have little incentive to run non-Russian crudes, Mr. Bronze said.

David Guttenfelder

Read Also: Do I Need Insurance To Register A Car In Ny

Walter Duranty’s Holodomor Coverage And Pulitzer

Walter Duranty, who served as its Moscow bureau chief from 1922 through 1936, has been criticized for a series of stories in 1931 on the Soviet Union and won a Pulitzer Prize for his work at that time however, he has been criticized for his denial of widespread famine, most particularly Holodomor, a famine in Soviet Ukraine in the 1930s in which he summarized Russian propaganda, and the Times published, as fact: “Conditions are bad, but there is no famine”.

In 2003, after the Pulitzer Board began a renewed inquiry, the Times hired , professor of Russian history at Columbia University, to review Duranty’s work. Von Hagen found Duranty’s reports to be unbalanced and uncritical, and that they far too often gave voice to Stalinistpropaganda. In comments to the press he stated, “For the sake of The New York Times’ honor, they should take the prize away.”The Ukrainian Weekly covered the efforts to rescind Duranty’s prize. The Times has since made a public statement and the Pulitzer committee has declined to rescind the award twice stating, “…Mr. Duranty’s 1931 work, measured by today’s standards for foreign reporting, falls seriously short. In that regard, the Board’s view is similar to that of The New York Times itself…”.

Popular Articles
Related news